May 15, 2026
Quick recap
This meeting focused on identifying gaps and challenges in substance use disorder treatment services across Texas, as ASAP prepared their legislative agenda and provided input to the state on strategic planning. Participants discussed key barriers including the breakdown in transitions from residential to outpatient care, transportation issues, and the lack of integrated mental health services, particularly following the loss of COPS-D funding. The group explored challenges with telehealth implementation, particularly for state-funded providers, and discussed the difficulty in measuring and proving treatment outcomes that could demonstrate cost savings to legislators. Participants also highlighted the need for better coordination between treatment facilities and recovery support services, as well as the importance of addressing co-occurring mental health disorders, with many organizations reporting that 75% or more of their clients have mental health concerns.


Over the years, our auditors make sure that we follow federal regulations as published in the Uniform Grant Guidelines. We are very careful to document as follows:
Donated goods and materials fall under the Uniform Guidance’s treatment of “in‑kind contributions” and are primarily addressed in:
2 CFR § 200.306 – Cost Sharing or Matching
2 CFR § 200.434 – Contributions and Donations
Under the Uniform Guidance, donated goods and materials (for example, supplies... provided at no charge) are treated as third‑party in‑kind contributions.
Donated goods and materials can be counted only if all cost‑sharing conditions are met under 2 CFR § 200.306(b). Specifically, the contribution must:
Be verifiable in the recipient’s records
Not be counted toward another federal award
Be necessary and reasonable for accomplishing the project objectives
Be allowable under the cost principles in Subpart E
Not be paid by the federal government under another award
Be included in the approved budget when required
Conform to all other applicable provisions of Part 200
Donated goods and materials must be valued at their fair market value at the time of donation—that is, what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller in an arms‑length transaction. The recipient must use the same valuation methods it uses for its own purchased goods, ensuring consistency and auditability. [govinfo.gov]